Thursday, June 13, 2019
An Examination of the Wikipedia Site Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words
An Examination of the Wikipedia Site - Essay ExampleThis has been related to the concept that the tint of control of internet subjects has not been well regulated especially in terms of the origin of the material, its perspectives and even the selection of references. With the users quick to use the randomness online, they slow fall into the trap of acquiring wrong information on sites such as Wikipedia. From my assessment, Wikipedia has more weaknesses than strengths. One of the limitations is that the site does not have accurate information that the user may need. In many instances, the readers find a great percentage of the pages on the site requiring citation even from the reader themselves (Wikipedia 2015). This beggarlys that the author of the work simply collected information from different sources and combined them to get a complete text. In the course of my research in English, I am likely to find inaccurate information and even wrong information on different subjects u sing the site. I would not even be surprise to find grammatical and spelling errors on the site. The page may also embrace a short form of words such as bt to mean but. Other examples of spelling errors include port as opposed to part (Wikipedia 2015).Secondly, Wikipedia is a not a reliable source since it provides a casualty for editing by any user (Wikipedia 2015). It is this point that the user may find a lot of misleading information on the subject in question especially with the differing views on different subjects. The quality of the content is, therefore, questionable thus, not applicable for my research in English. This finding also explains that the claims posted argon indeed questionable.As opposed to scholarly articles, Wikipedia contains shallow information that uses headings to lure the users into using their site and applying their findings. At times, the facts presented in the page may not be required, such as ahistorical background to merely all topics, and the res t of the information is not provided (Wikipedia 2015).
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment